Intended for healthcare professional education

Clinical evidence

Q-FFICIENCY

The QDOT MICRO™ Catheter Investigational Device Exemption Study.


Safety and effectiveness goals met. Key results included the following: 3.6% primary adverse eventsa 1.8% catheter-related primary adverse events.1,2

QDOT MICRO™ Catheter

Study Design

Interventions
  • First PV Encirclement
    • QMODE+™ Ablation Mode setting
      (90 W, up to 4 seconds) required
  • PV Touch-up
    • QMODE™ setting
      (25–50 W, target temperature 50°C, CF 5–30 g)
  • Non-PV Ablation
    • QMODE+™ or QMODE™ setting per investigator discretion
Population
  • Single-arm, prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, investigational device exemption study
  • 22 US institutions
  • 166 evaluable participants with symptomatic paroxysmal AF
Follow-up
  • 12-month follow-up with stringent monitoring (3-month blanking, 9-month evaluation)
    • ECG (1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits)
    • TTM (weekly 3–5 months, monthly 6–12 months, when symptomatic)
    • 24-h Holter (12-month visit)

Results

Safety and effectiveness1

Thumbs up icon

3.6%
primary adverse event ratea

  • The safety endpoint was met (14% performance goal)
  • The catheter-related adverse event rate was low at 1.8%
Heart anatomy icon

77%
primary effectiveness rateb

The 12-month freedom from documented AF/AFL/AT recurrence and freedom from failure modes was 77% (50% performance goal).

Celebration icon

86%
clinical success
(freedom from symptomatic recurrence)

The 12-month freedom from repeat ablation was 92%.

Quality of life and healthcare utilization2

A couple laughing in the hospital room

Quality of life

  • 88% of participants achieved clinically meaningful improvements in quality-of-life based on patient-reported AFEQT questionnaire responses.c
  • 99% improvement in control of AF at 12-months postablation
  • 93% improvement in relief of AF symptoms at 12-months postablation
A physician having a consult with their patient and family

Healthcare utilization

  • The 12-month freedom from cardiovascular hospitalization was 89%. Q-FFICIENCY participants experienced significant reduction in healthcare utilization.
  • 80% reduction in Class III AAD use 6–12 months postablation compared to baseline (P<0.0001)
  • 94% reduction in cardioversion use during evaluation period compared to 12-months preablation (P<0.0001)

Legacy technology comparisons1

Chart showing RF Catheter Technology Evolution from 2010 to 2023

Enhanced efficacy and efficiency with QDOT-MICRO™ Catheter ablation

Compared to stringently monitored studies for previous power-controlled RF ablation technologies, temperature-controlled ablation with the QDOT MICRO™ Catheter led to 69% reduction in fluid delivery via the study catheter, 41% shorter ablation time, 82% reduction in fluoroscopy time, 30% increase in freedom from documented recurrence, and 23% increase in clinical success (freedom from symptomatic recurrence).

Bar chart showing the various evolving technologies comparing ablation times, RF application times, and fluoroscopy times.
Bar chart showing the various evolving technologies comparing volume of catheter fluid delivery
Bar chart showing the various evolving technologies comparing probabilities of clinical success and freedom from documented recurrence.

Figures adapted from: Osorio, et al. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023;9(4):468-480 under the CC BY license.

Conclusions

Safety and effectiveness goals met

  • Q-FFICIENCY demonstrated the safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of ablation with the QDOT MICRO™ Catheter for paroxysmal AF.
  • QMODE+™ and QMODE™ ablation led to improved quality-of-life and significant reduction in AAD use, cardioversion, and cardiovascular hospitalization.
  • Compared to similarly designed studies for legacy catheters, temperature-controlled ablation improved efficiency and effectiveness without compromising safety.d
QDOT MICRO™ Catheter
QDOT MICRO™ Catheter

Safety and effectiveness goals met

  • Q-FFICIENCY demonstrated the safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of ablation with the QDOT MICRO™ Catheter for paroxysmal AF.
  • QMODE+™ and QMODE™ ablation led to improved quality-of-life and significant reduction in AAD use, cardioversion, and cardiovascular hospitalization.
  • Compared to similarly designed studies for legacy catheters, temperature-controlled ablation improved efficiency and effectiveness without compromising safety.d

Abbreviations, References, and Disclosures

a. Primary adverse events included death, atrioesophageal fistula, myocardial infarction, stroke/cerebrovascular accident, thromboembolism, transient ischemic attack, phrenic nerve injury/diaphragmatic paralysis, heart block, PV stenosis, pulmonary edema (respiratory insufficiency), vagal nerve injury, pericarditis, and major vascular access complication/bleeding. Atrioesophageal fistula and PV stenosis that occurring 7–90 days postablation, and cardiac tamponade/perforation occurring ≤30 days of ablation, were also considered primary adverse events.


b. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from documented recurrence of AF/AFL/AT ≥30 seconds and freedom from 3 additional failure modes: acute procedural failure (failure to confirm entrance block in all PVs or use of nonstudy catheter), repeat ablation failure (>2 repeat ablation during blanking period, use of nonstudy catheter for repeat ablation during blanking, or any repeat ablation postblanking), and AAD failure (new AAD/higher dose postblanking).

c. A ±5-point change in AFEQT score is considered a clinically significant change in quality of life.

d. Comparing data from nonrandomized, independent, prospective, single-arm multicenter studies with similar designs: Q-FFICIENCY (n=166, Osorio et al 2023), NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL IDE (n=106, Wilber et al, 2010), SMART-AF (n=160, Natale et al, 2014) and VISTAX (n=329, Duytschaever et al, 2020). The Q-FFICIENCY study safety performance goal was met; the posterior mean of the primary adverse event rate was 4.2%, with a 95% Bayesian credible interval of 1.7% to 7.7%, well below the 14% performance criterion. Based on the 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement (Calkins et al, 2017), the primary safety events observed in the Q-FFICIENCY study are in line with what is expected of catheter ablation studies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.


AAD, antiarrhythmic drug; AF, atrial fibrillation; AFEQT, Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life questionnaire; AFL, atrial flutter; AT, atrial tachycardia; CF, contact force; ECG, electrocardiogram; RF, radiofrequency; TTM, transtelephonic monitoring.


  1. Osorio J, Hussein AA, Delaughter MC, et al. Very high-power short-duration, temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the prospective multicenter Q-FFICIENCY trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023;9(4):468-480.
  2. Hussein A, Delaughter MC, Monir G, et al. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with a novel temperature-controlled CF-sensing catheter: Q-FFICIENCY clinical and healthcare utilization benefits. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. Published online October 23, 2023. doi: 10.1111/jce.16093.
  3. Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, et al. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303(4):333340.
  4. Natale A, Reddy VY, Monir G, et al. Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(7):647-656. 
  5. Duytschaever M, Vijgen J, De Potter T, et al. Standardized pulmonary vein isolation workflow to enclose veins with contiguous lesions: the multicentre VISTAX trial. Europace. 2020;22:1645-1652

Important information: Prior to use, refer to the instructions for use supplied with the device for indications, contraindications, side effects, warnings and precautions. Caution: US law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician.

In the US, THERMOCOOL™ Navigation Catheters are indicated for the treatment of drug refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, when used with CARTO® Systems (excluding NAVISTAR™ RMT THERMOCOOL™ Catheter).
 



The THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ SF Catheter is indicated for the treatment of drug refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and for drug refractory recurrent symptomatic persistent AF (continuous AF > 7 days but < 1 year), refractory or intolerant to at least 1 Class I or III AAD, when used with the CARTO® 3 System.
 



The Johnson & Johnson and its affiliates QDOT MICRO™ Catheters and related accessory devices are indicated for catheter-based cardiac electrophysiological mapping (stimulating and recording) and, when used in conjunction with a compatible radiofrequency generator, for the treatment of:• Type I atrial flutter in patients age 18 or older.• Drug refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, when used with compatible three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping systems. The Johnson & Johnson and its affiliates QDOT MICRO™ Catheters provide real-time measurement of contact force between the catheter tip and heart wall, as well as location information when used with CARTO™ 3 Navigation System.


The VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module with EPU (VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module) is compatible with the QDOT MICRO™ Catheter. Equivalent Tag Index values do not represent equivalent RF lesion size. The recommended Tag Index target values for the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ Catheter and THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ SF Catheter (i.e., 550 for anterior/roof/ridge segments and 380 for posterior/inferior segments of PV encircling lesions) should not be used to guide ablations with the QDOT MICRO™ catheter.




The third-party trademarks used herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.


This site is published by Johnson & Johnson and its affiliates, which is solely responsible for its contents. It is intended for visitors from the United States.

US_ELP_THER_221837.1