You are about to leave jnjmedtech.com. By clicking to continue, you will be taken to a web site governed by their own Legal and Privacy Policies.
ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler
ECHELON CIRCULAR had anastomotic leak (AL) rates of 1.8% and 1.7% in two clinical studies. An Independent Clinical Study demonstrated an 85% reduction in AL rate compared to manual circular staplers (1.7% v. 11.8%, p=0.02)2
Features and Benefits
Supporting Documentation
Product Support
ECHELON CIRCULAR Powered Stapler Product Brochure
ECHELON CIRCULAR Powered Stapler Optimal Device Performance Guide
ECHELON CIRCULAR Competitive Comparison Guide
ECHELON CIRCULAR Powered Stapler Fact Sheet
ECHELON CIRCULAR Powered Stapler Battery Pack Fact Sheet
Clinical Evidence
ECHELON CIRCULAR Clinical Study - Spain
ECHELON CIRCULAR Clinical Study - US and Europe
ECHELON CIRCULAR Real World Evidence Comparison Study
ECHELON CIRCULAR Economic Analysis
Product Specifications
|
Product Code |
Description |
|---|---|
| CDH23P | 23mm Powered Circular with Gripping Surface Technology and 3D Staples |
|
Product Code |
Description |
|---|---|
| CDH25P | 25mm Powered Circular with Gripping Surface Technology and 3D Staples |
|
Product Code |
Description |
|---|---|
| CDH29P | 29mm Powered Circular with Gripping Surface Technology and 3D Staples |
|
Product Code |
Description |
|---|---|
| CDH31P | 31mm Powered Circular with Gripping Surface Technology and 3D Staples |
References
1 Benchtop testing in porcine tissue ≤30mmHg (26mmHg average pressure experienced during intra-operative leak test), comparing Ethicon ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler CDH25P to Medtronic DST Series™ EEA™ Stapler EEA2535 (p<0.001) and preclinical perfusion model, in which perfusion was not significantly different between devices.
2 Impact of the Novel Powered Circular Stapler on Risk of Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Anastomosis. A Propensity Score-Matched Study. [ECHELON CIRCULAR 1.7% (1/60) vs. manual circular 11.8% (14/119), p=0.022]
3 Staple line analysis in benchtop testing, comparing Ethicon ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler CDH25P to Medtronic DST Series™ EEA™ Stapler EEA2535.
4 Benchtop testing on porcine colon, comparing Ethicon ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler CDH25P to Medtronic DST Series™ EEA™ Stapler EEA2535, p<0.001.
5 Benchtop testing, comparing Ethicon ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler CDH25P to Medtronic DST Series™ EEA™ Stapler EEA2535, p=0.001.
6 Users fring in a porcine model, comparing Ethicon ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler CDH25P to Medtronic DST Series™ EEA™ Stapler EEA2535, p=0.003.
7 Preclinical perfusion model comparing Ethicon CDH29P to Medtronic EEA2835, in which perfusion was not statistically signifcantly diferent between devices (p>0.005).
For complete indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse reactions, please reference full package insert.
© Ethicon US, LLC. 2019.
For complete indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse reactions, please reference full package insert.
This site is published by Ethicon US, LLC, which is solely responsible for its contents, and is intended for U.S. audiences only.
This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals. If you are a patient, it is important that you discuss information about the benefits and risks of products with your doctor.
Last updated February 20, 2019. The third-party trademarks used herein are trademarks of their respective owners. Data and usage fees may apply. See your carrier for more information.