“ECHELON™-Magazine mit Gripping Surface Technology bedeuten für mich Sicherheit, eine gewisse Unbesorgtheit.”
— Pr. David Nocca, MD, PhD, Bariatric Surgeon
Was Anwender:innen über die ECHELON GST-Magazine sagen
Sind Sie bereit für ein Umdenken bei der Auswahl des Magazins?
-
Auswahl des richtigen Magazins
Hilfreiche Links

Kolorektale Chirurgie
Wir setzen uns dafür ein, das Risiko von Komplikationen und damit verbundene Kosten bei der kolorektalen Chirurgie zu verringern. Wir bemühen uns um eine bessere Vorhersagbarkeit der Ergebnisse, indem wir Innovation mit Aufklärung und Forschung verknüpfen.

Bariatrische Chirurgie
Wir setzen uns dafür ein, die Zukunft der Chirurgie im Kampf gegen Fettleibigkeit und Stoffwechselerkrankungen mitzugestalten und tragen dazu bei, die Behandlungsqualität durch Forschung und Evidenz, erstklassige Aus- und Weiterbildung, innovative Produkte und die Ausweitung des Zugangs von Patient:innen zu Behandlungen zu verbessern. Gemeinsam entwickeln wir chirurgische Behandlungen weiter und ermöglichen Patient:innen ein längeres und erfüllteres Leben.

Thoraxchirurgie
Wir setzen uns dafür ein, dass die Operationen personalisierter und mit weniger Schmerzen für die Patient:innen verbunden sind. Hierzu lassen wir Erfahrungen aus den Hauptkomplikationen der Thoraxchirurgie in das gewebespezifische Design unserer Instrumente einfließen.

Ethicon-Kundensupport
Referenzen
*Benchtop testing in porcine tissue for ECHELON+ Stapler with GST Reloads. Reliable staple line integrity defined as 0.9 reliability at 90% confidence over the intended tissue thickness range for each reload. The Echelon+ Stapler with GST Reloads accommodates a tissue thickness range of 1.0mm to 4.0mm (measured at 8g/mm2, tissue comfortably compressed to closed staple height during firing per IFU) while the Medtronic Tri-Staple™ portfolio is intended for a tissue thickness range of 0.75mm to 3.0mm (per manufacturer IFU); and, Intuitive EndoWrist® Stapler portfolio for a thicknesses range of 0.75mm - 2.0mm (per user manual PN 551681-07 Rev. C 2016.12).
† Compared with Ethicon and leading competitor manual and/or leading competitor powered staplers.
‡ May eliminate one reload per procedure due to less tissue slippage during firing. In benchtop testing in porcine stomach tissue, the Ethicon ECHELON+ Stapler with GST Reloads (PSEE60A, GST60T) had less mean longitudinal change in 4.0mm thick tissue, 0.79mm vs. 4.09mm, compared to the Medtronic Signia™ Stapling System (SIGPHANDLE, SIG60AXT), p-value <0.05.
¥ Benchtop testing in 3.2mm synthetic tissue comparing staple line compression between ECHELON+ Stapler with GST Reloads (PSEE60A, GST60B, GST60G) to Medtronic Signia™ and Endo GIA™ Staplers with Tri-Staple™ Reloads (EGIA60AMT). Resulting in a statistically significant compression uniformity, p<0.05.
§ Advancing staple line security with fewer leakage pathways and less malformed staples. Fewer leakage pathways: benchtop testing in porcine tissue ≤ 30mmHg (26mmHG average pressure experienced during typical leak test), comparing Ethicon ECHELON+ Stapler PSEE60A with GST Reloads GST60B to Medtronic Signia™ and Endo GIA™ Staplers with Tri-Staple™ Reloads EGIA60AMT. Cumulative number of leaked tests (0/30), (7/30) & (9/30) respectively, n=30, p < 0.05. Fewer malformed staples: benchtop testing in 3.3mm and 4.0mm porcine tissue comparing malformed staples between ECHELON+ Stapler with GST Reloads (GST60B, GST60T) to Medtronic Signia™ Stapler with Tri-Staple™ Reloads (EGIA60AMT, EGIA60AXT) and Endo GIA™ with Tri-Staple™ Reloads (EGIA60AMT, EGIA60AXT). Percentage malformed results: 1.14% vs 4.28%, p < 0.05
1.Ethicon, PRC093801A Project Cowbell 45mm GST Reload SLI/FSH DV Completion Report, April 2020, Data on file Ethicon, PRC095237B Project Cowbell 60mm GST Reload SLI/FSH DV Completion Report, July 2020, Data on file Ethicon, 18082020 ECHELON+ with GST Reloads Tissue Thickness Range Memo, Aug 2020, Data on file da Vinci Xi, EndoWrist® Stapler, Instruments and Accessories User Manual Addendum (PN 551681-07 Rev. C 2016.12) Covidien Endo GIA IFU (11/08-1, 2011) (167038-211112 EMEA)
2. Rawlins L, Johnson BH, Johnston S, Elangovanraaj N, et al. Comparative effectiveness assessment of two powered surgical stapling platforms in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective matched study. Med Devices (Auckl). 2020;13:195-204 .
3. Roy S, Yoo A, Yadalam S, et al. Comparison of economic and clinical outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery with powered vs. manual endoscopic surgical staplers. J Med Econ. 2017;20(4):423-433.
4. Tsunezuka Y, Tanaka N, Fujimori H. The impact of endoscopic stapler selection on bleeding at the vascular stump in pulmonary artery transection. Med Devices (Auckl). 2020;13:41-47.
5. Park SY, Kim DJ, Mo Nam C, et al. Clinical and economic benefits associated with the use of powered and tissue-specific endoscopic staplers among the patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. J Med Econ. 2019;22(12):1274-1280.
6. Miller D, Roy S, Kassis E, Yadalam S, Ramisetti S, Johnston S. Impact of powered and tissue-specific endoscopic stapling technology on clinical and economic outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy procedures: a retrospective, observational study. Adv Ther. 2018;35(5):707-723.
7. Ethicon, PRC068594B Interchangeability of ECHELON FLEX™ Powered Stapler, ECHELON FLEX™ Powered Plus Stapler, ENDOPATH ECHELON™ Reloads and ENDOPATH ECHELON™ Reloads with Gripping Surface Technology (GST), Sep 2014, Data on file
8. Ethicon, 25032021 Memo GST Reloads and Closed Bottom Channel, March 2021, Data on file
9 Ethicon, PRC097776A Evaluation of stomach tissue movement during stapler firing for claims: Cowbell vs Signia, Nov 2020, Data on file (162866-211123 EMEA)
10. Ethicon, 05112021 ECHELON™+ Powered Stapler with GST Reloads Claims, Data on file (195788-211115 EMEA, 195186-211109 EMEA)
11. Ethicon, PRC097500B.3 Cowbell Foam Uniform Compression Study for Claims: Cowbell Powered Plus with GST vs. Covidien Endo GIA with Tri-Staple, Oct 2020, Data on file (158247-201105 EMEA)
12. Ethicon, PRC096436A Ex-Vivo Comparison of Staple Line Leak Pressure: Echelon Flex Powered Plus Stapler with GST vs Endo GIA and Signia with Tri-Staple Technology, Aug 2020, Data on file Ethicon, PRC096858A Evaluation of Malformed Staples in Thick Tissue for Claims: Echelon Flex Powered Plus Stapler with GST vs Endo GIA and Signia with Tri-Staple Technology, Aug 2020, Data on file (159504-201117 EMEA)